posted by [identity profile] ghostpaw.livejournal.com at 01:39am on 27/02/2004
Re the slightly bonkers situation in the US, this does appear to be an entirely vote-related endeavor. Why? Because at the same time as banning gay 'marriage', the Shrub is also putting through changes in the law that will allow same-sex 'civil unions'. So, we'll give you the same legal status, the same tax breaks etc, but you aren't allowed to call yourself 'Married' :lol:

Tyrshundr and meself had a look into the etymology of the word, on the theory that if it wasn't Hebrew they couldn't say it was a Biblical concept. Unsuprisingly, it's Latin, and I can't remember if the Romans had a policy on it.

Anyway, what 'Marriage' traces down to is the state of being a 'Husband', which then traces down to a man who owns a farm. So by that dint, Queen Victoria was right, gay men could be 'married', but lesbians can't!

February

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22 23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28