palfrey: (Default)
2015-02-22 12:09 am

Convention over configuration: other opinions

Part of me was idly thinking about the modern idea of Convention over configuration and idly wondering what some languages' anthropomorphic opinions on more important things than convention are...

Java: Yet more meaningless XML over convention.
C: Write it your self over convention.
Old-school LISP: vast sequence of hand-tooled, organisation-specific macros over convention.
C#: Microsoft's current convention over any community convention.
Machine code: the CPU is the convention!
BASIC: if you're writing stuff in BASIC that needs configuration, run away!
Python: the convention may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
palfrey: (Default)
2014-10-12 01:54 pm

Should I give up on Doctor Who?

So, I'm currently 3 episodes behind on Doctor Who, and I'm wondering if it's worth it anymore. To give some background, one of the changes I've been making over the last few years is to give up on TV series when I'm just not enjoying them anymore, rather than continuing out of sheer stubborness. That's not to say I won't watch some things out of stubborness (Gilmore Girls Season 7, House Season 8, etc) but I've only got so much time, and if a series isn't fun anymore I should stop.

Series I have given up on:

  • Dexter - gave up after realising I had all of Season 4 on my server, and no interest in watching it.

  • Big Bang Theory - somewhere in the middle of Season 6, I was no longer having fun. I possibly should have given up a season earlier.

  • Heroes - Season 3 I think? It was just repeating the same old stories and wasn't any fun anymore.

There's probably a couple more, but Doctor Who looks like it's likely to join them. Peter Capaldi is fairly decent, but I suspect I was watching the Matt Smith run out of sheer stubborness, and now it's just not fun anymore. There's some entertaining bits in there, but there's so much good TV out there these days and I don't have enough time to watch it all, so some things have to go. The only reason I think I'm watching now is the long history with the series, and I'm pretty sure that I wouldn't watch a new series with the same sorts of stories, which is always a sign you should stop watching something.

I suspect there will be a fair number of comments along the lines of "No! You must! It's brilliant!" and probably something about "All British sci-fi fans watch Doctor Who!!!", and I think I now need to group those under the opinions on other series I don't like e.g. Supernatural, in that my preferences differ from others and that collectively we watch different things, and Doctor Who is now about to get grouped under "stuff I no longer watch".

End of a (personal) era. C'est la vie.
palfrey: (Default)
2014-08-13 12:09 pm

NineWorlds 2014 writeup

Despite having had the last couple of days off, I hadn't managed a NineWorlds writeup yet. That I basically went *plonk* on Monday is part of the reason, but hey, here I am now. When you look at the list of stuff I did, you may understand. Also, this is probably missing many things I can't remember. Note to self: write notes.

So, awesome things already mentioned elsewhere: The @9Waccess communication tags. Started off with a blue and a yellow, later finding out that the yellow wasn't so useful for how my head works, but that the red ones are very handy for the mid-con "and now I'm just shattered" periods. Blue one also acted as a conversation starter earlier, as many folks weren't aware of them. Will be bringing my set along to Loncon3, and if I'm organised enough today, will bring extras for others :)

Cosplay: All the cosplay, all the time. Felt like almost half the people were in cosplay sometimes. I only had my Jayne hat, but wore it for all of Friday and Sunday, and got a fair few "nice hat" and "Man walks down the street in that hat, people know he's not afraid of anything" got repeated a few times. Special mentions to the folks in the full Aliens marines; the full-blown Alien; the woman with the crocheted facehugger (and the alien pod bag, and the Wonder Woman crocheted costume); a Gamora; and so many more that my tired brain can't remember properly.

And now to the panels. I'm going to be a little bit brutal here, as there was a few items I was less happy with. Overall, *loved* them, and judging from digging around Twitter a bit, one person's "amazing panel" is another person's "boring, done before", but I'll chime in myself anyways. The full schedule was pretty crowded, so there's a few things I missed (one on time travel for instance), but I think I saw a good set:

  • Thursday

    • Fanvids and gaming: played Slash with some folks, doing a somewhat more hardcore variant that involved each detailing every pairing, which worked well. Fanvids were silly: 80s intro style versions of Stargate for example...

    • Cheese & Cheese!: Readings of various cheesy work, and some eating of cheese. They ran out of folks on the list, and asked for more, so I got to read Original Message to the crowd, which was much fun :)


  • Friday

    • Symbolism and Metaphor of Buffy: very good, very interesting. Realised just how long it's been, and resolved to rewatch all of it sometime...

    • From Killer Drones, To Cuddly Robot Companions: More about the history of robotics, but still a good talk by @SciWriBy

    • Prop Weapons Construction: Basically, making fake guns from foamboard and a craft knife. Very good, very hands-on (as in every audience member got to cut stuff!). Had a gorgeous replica Halo shotgun he'd built.

    • Writing Better Characters: mainly around video games, but I was there more thinking from the PoV of narrative role playing games. Many recommendations of things I hadn't heard of/played.

    • Looking Forwards: Supposedly about the future and books of the future, but kinda boring. Skipped out of there for the fanwork recs panel which included the utterly awesome Steve Rogers at 100: Celebrating Captain America on Film

    • The Mechanisms: Awesome steampunk band telling cyberpunk tales of dystopian futures. Stuck around for "Ulysses Dies At Dawn", but then had to get some food before I fell over, so missed their second set.

    • Last year's best fanvids: Trying to remember this much. Suspect there was some good bits in there, but was a bit tired by that point. I may have only been there briefly...

    • Nine Worlds party: Had the awesome Queen tribute band Rhapsody who did an excellent set. Was bouncing around wearing my Jayne hat :)


  • Saturday - started off fairly broken because of all the things on Friday

    • Cyberpunk: exploring society in the corporate machine age (.net): Seemed very interesting, but I was rather dead at this point, so skipped out for coffee and collapsing.

    • Dragons vs Werewolves vs Vampires vs Warlocks: The Ultimate Deathmatch Smackdown: Awesome, awesome, awesome! One of my favourite panels. Werewolves and Vampires were fairly weak, but Warlocks had Scott Lynch doing variants on the theme of "Warlocks rule!" and Elizabeth Bear (Dragons) smacking him down repeatedly. Very very funny. Panel members kept repeatedly slipping between "they do X" and "we do X", leading to the possibility that Scott Lynch is in fact a hidden warlock, which is just funny.

    • In Conversation with Reiner Knizia: So, game designer, should be interesting, but I just wasn't feeling it. Brain was still a bit fuzzy at that point.

    • GoT: Season 4 in Review: 4 (deceased) cast members talking about season 4, and just generally the experience of being on set during Game of Thrones. Twitter seems to indicate some more hardcore fans didn't like it so much, but I thought it rocked. Miltos Yerolemou is damn cool.

    • Some food was gotten early at this point, then caught a bit of Quantum Battlestar Deep-Space Voyager Tardis Wars: The Million Dollar Space Epic. All of the bad puns (including a meta "Your puns are weak old man" Star Wars one). Worth seeing properly at another time.

    • Whedonverse Sing-Along: Very, very cool. Singing through "Once More With Feeling" and then Dr Horrible (with yours truly being on stage for the latter). Dr Horrible had a pair of folks, him as Captain Hammer, her as Dr Horrible, doing impromptu acting for the end scenes, which was amazing. Then we got to sing the Firefly theme :) Songbook covers were cool as well.

    • Ducked into the Steampunk cabaret, but the sheer level of horrible puns was too much (cockney steampunk music-hall parodies: just say no)

    • Edible Knitting: knitting cord bracelets from strawberry laces: Caught the last half an hour or so, and made a bracelet. Crochet (or at least the very basics) is now less scary, and we were encouraged to eat our mistakes, which is always good :)

    • The Duke Mitchell Film Club: Saw some of the very silly movies there. Good folks.

    • Rock Club: Got horribly delayed by Bifrost's lack of realistic timing. Thankfully I decided to have an early night (only like 11:30pm) instead, which was a good plan.


  • Sunday

    • Neuroscience of Swearing: @SciWriBy back for more, this time with experiments involving dumping an arm in cold water and seeing if having a swear word to say increased people's average times they could stay in there (it does). I'm now curious about how things that aren't swear words currently could be made ones. Current candidate: "sturdy"

    • This was followed by Illusions and Brains by @DCorney who has managed to get computer systems to see some of the same optical illusions as humans do. Apparently it's a side-effect of being able to disambiguate scenes.

    • Spock vs the Sorcerers: F or SF? The Genre Deathmatch Smackdown!: More of the same as Saturday's one, but slightly less dramatic. Fantasy was losing very badly, although the Baron Harkonnen doll and the creepy Eye of Sauron toy didn't help things. That, and Geoffrey Ryman being very eloquent.

    • Food in Science Fiction: Everything from pills to hydroponics, to a fair amount of childrens books. Not bad, although the room felt like we were being broiled.

    • Epic Fantasy: the panel of prophecy!: Heavy on the authors talking about their own stuff, which when it's folks like Scott Lynch and Elizabeth Bear is no bad thing. Got a few recs out of it as well.

    • Applied Mathematics: Poetry for Geeks: I'd run into Dan Simpson earlier in the con, watching on a Netrunner game, so was interesting to see the poetry side. Lots of meta-stuff and playing with the medium, which was good.


palfrey: (Default)
2011-07-04 11:48 pm

The real world behind Glee

WARNING: Spoiler alert. I'm specifically spoiling about things in 2x22 ("New York"), but may well jump around elsewhere. I'm not specifically intending on spoiling other earlier episodes, or touching on big plot items, but I'm also making no effort to not do so if it serves my point. You have been warned!

So, I've been curious for a while about the notion of the real world behind Glee. Or, in other words, what actually happens, away from all of the flights of fancy. It seems to me like a fascinating discussion within the diegetic world of Glee, and most probably in other series. There's probably a good word for what I'm talking about, but I don't know what it is yet. Feel free to enlighten me!

All of Glee is (fairly) realistic, but not connected. This is very much in the mainstream musical tradition from which it draws, but I'd like to explain further what I mean (again here with the lack of vocabulary, being a non-scholar in this area). It's realistic in the sense that pretty much everything *could* happen (in the sense that given sufficient planning and orchestration making all those singers and dancers appear out of nowhere could be done), it's just not connected (e.g. if someone breaks up with someone else, the chance of them having a bunch of their mates around to do a dance number about it implies a level of narcissism not present even in the average teenager).

This implies to me that the diegetic elements are split: there's what actually happens, and there's the flights of fancy and musical theatre emphasis. Both are needed to build the full story, but I'd still like to see them occasionally split and know what the darn term is for the split!

spoilers... )

Thoughts anyone?
palfrey: (Default)
2011-05-22 08:52 pm

Solving the sticky badge problem

If you go along to a tech event (like say OpenTech this last weekend), one of the first things you'll probably be directed to on entering (other than the bar) will be a stack of sticky labels and some pens. This is intended to solve the dual problems of not everyone knowing everyone else, as well as some of us possibly knowing each others Twitter names but not what some folks look like out in the real world. It does fix the problem pretty well, but there's a few flaws.
  1. My handwriting sucks.
  2. Most badges aren't visible at any decent distance
  3. They're annoying, especially if you end up having to remove a layer of clothing because the aircon isn't coping with many geeks in a small space and then the sticker needs moving...

Enter a solution I've had in my head for a while, but just got around to building this week:Read more... )
palfrey: (Default)
2011-04-16 10:42 pm

Still looking for a new flatmate...

So, I'm in the market for a new flatmate. Actually, I should have tried to locate one quite some time ago, but my (limited) efforts have failed so far, partially because there wasn't that much pressure to locate one, but I'd still quite like to pay less rent...

So, here's the situation. I'm currently short one flatmate, and paying all the rent. This is bad, but given that's possible, I'm willing to be flexible on the level of rent paid. The only restriction here is "no randoms". Ditto for no friends-of-friends: if I haven't met you already, don't bother. There's more uncertainty in that sort of situation than I'm comfortable with, and I'd rather live alone than with someone I don't know.

Officially speaking, the rent is £617 pcm and utilities are ~£50, but quite frankly at this point, make me an offer! Preference will be given to folks who I know better/willing to pay more/move in sooner, but lower offers may well work!

It's in Bow, just around the corner of Bow Road station (prod me for full address if you don't already have it) and the transport links are great (DLR, H&C, District within 2 minutes, Central 10 minutes, many buses inc. 24 hour). It's a lovely flat!

There is the little issue that I'm probably moving out in mid-September when the rental agreement finishes as I'm intending on buying somewhere, but the estate agents we're dealing with seem pretty happy with letting me/whoever else stay on for as many years as you'd like, so you could stick around for as long as you like after that.

Um, help!
palfrey: (Default)
2011-02-14 12:05 am

Automating a meme: Compound Movies

Earlier tonight dylanbeattie started tweeting a few things with the #compoundmovies hashtag. Basic idea is that you take two films, where the first ends with the same word as the first word of the second and mash them together, and some of them are pretty funny.

Of course, this obviously lends itself to automation, and my suggestion of trawling IMDB got the response from him that they've already supplied the data for me, so no trawling needed. However, IMDB contains far too many movies, most of which have names I don't even know the meanings for, and generating the data for this from the IMDB data will take an insane amount of time. However, there's also Wikipedia, which despite some complaints I'd heard about it's API, appears to be pretty easy to use.

So, here we go, a #compoundMovies generator. Either run it as "compoundGenerator.py imdb" if you've got lots of time, or as "compoundGenerator.py wikipedia <some category name>" (without the "Category:" bit). I tried it out on "British_films" and got back a few interesting things:Read more... )
palfrey: (Default)
2010-12-09 12:09 am

Soho! (or why games need playtesters)

Tonight I was at the launch thing for Soho!, a board game about being editors at a small London literary magazine. I'm not entirely sure if I managed to piss some people off slighty, but it was pretty much that or shut up entirely and I'll pick honest criticism over that any day.

The core mechanic was not bad. You're wandering around London, trying to track down a bunch of writers in pubs, while navigating via various means of transport - walking, boris bikes, taxis - and that basic idea of switching between different methods was pretty good. There's a trade-off in that there's a continuum between slow methods that can go anywhere (walking) through to fast methods which will run into the one-way system and more obstructions (taxis) with bikes as a middle option.

The problem was that there was all this other crap: lots and lots of extra rules tagged onto this mechanic; overly complicated methods that take many turns to switch between transport modalities; an awful lot of board changes without sufficient player moves inbetween; etc.

I had a bit of a chat with the author, and he admitted that it's entire playtesting was him and his girlfriend repeatedly going over it again and again. It's possibly quite funny to readers of Smoke (the literary magazine this is being done off the back of), but it's not worth it for the rest of us. Given the cool shit going on with boardgames in London, this was somewhat disappointing...
palfrey: (Default)
2010-10-24 07:47 pm

Budget cuts: making them more real?

I've been listening to all the talk about the cuts recently, and hearing the various ways it's going to screw over various people I know. I've just had a quick dig through all the so far listed stuff myself, and although I agree it's a fucked-up situation and I'm annoyed that I indirectly voted for this, I'm not seeing much that'll hit me. I'm seeing a rise in tube fares, possibly a bit more tax, but not much else. This is partially due to getting out of academia at what turns out to be pretty much exactly the right time, but my other things of a financial nature are also generally in the best state they've ever been, which is a big insulating factor here.

Net result is that this all feels a little distant. It'll probably feel less so once I actually see all this kicking in and the consequences hit my friends, but for the moment it all seems unreal, and that's what I'm wondering about. If it seems unreal for me, given I'm listening to various folks and hearing about what this will do to them, how does it feel to others without that level of political interest/social groupings? More importantly, how can it be made to feel more real (short of a coup d'etat and rewriting of the budget) so maybe we get more people annoyed and possibly shame the Tories out of a bit more of this crap and/or make sure the fuckers don't get back in next time?

Ideas anyone?
palfrey: (Default)
2010-09-30 09:25 pm

Mixed day: good bits, bad bits

Today has been a day of ups and downs:

Read more... )
palfrey: (Default)
2010-09-20 11:46 pm

Random game ideas: Cattle prods and Sumo wrestlers

(For those of you in the pub earlier some of this will be familiar, but here's the longer version for the benefit of everyone else).

After yesterday's post, somehow the time when I should have been sleeping last night instead had my mind running around plotting the possible conversations that could occur from discussing such matters (this is something I seem to do reflexively when bored). I eventually reached a discussion about the game Fat Princess. It's basically a Capture the Flag variant, except that the 'flag' is an enormously fat princess who can be fed further slices of cake in order to make her heavier and ergo harder to steal. Not having a PS3, I haven't played it myself, but it comes up in discussion on various video game sites every so often, and it seemed like a interesting variant gameplay-wise on a rather tired genre.

I started considering a male equivalent of this, given that the 'joke' can be considered in somewhat questionable taste given the intersection of standard gender roles and weight. A "fat prince" quite frankly isn't as funny, and making any of the other related male archetypes obese (knights, wizards, loveable rogue, etc) also didn't work. Somehow I ended up with the idea of vast sumo wrestlers, and instead of the multiple players trying to save the princess, I'm thinking the best defence is a good offence.

So here's the plot/game running through my head in the wee hours of the morning: it's the nearby future, and sumo wrestlers have gotten even bigger. They've also gotten rather sedentary, and no longer care about the traditions of the sport. It's therefore up to their handlers to save the traditions and bring victory once again to their metabolically-challenged masters. Hence, the cattle prods.

Basic gameplay is as follows: two handlers and their associated wrestlers, who given no other motivation will simply sit there. A handler can however prod a wrestler with his cattle prod, and if he prods them enough then the wrestler will get a bit pissed off and start to turn towards the source of the minor irritation (they've got too much bulk to be really harmed, but they can get annoyed). If you keep on prodding the wrestler, they'll go into a bestial rage and charge straight forwards until they either hit something suitably solid or get bored after a bit. Effectively you're herding your wrestler such that they eventually shove the other one out of the arena, and thus get a traditional sumo victory! Of course, you can also prod the other wrestler and distract them if you're feeling creative...

There's a lot more possibilities that can be added to the basic concept (prodding the other handler to stun them temporarily; lures for wrestlers - I'm thinking a ham sandwich with mustard; setting the entire thing on a platform that shifts according to where the enormously fat wrestlers move; etc) but the basic idea sounds quite fun. This sort of action game with the ability to set stuff in motion but then be forced to deal with the consequences of your choices is ripe for unintended consequences and emergent gameplay scenarios IMHO.
palfrey: (Default)
2010-09-20 12:43 am
Entry tags:

Diegetic death in Halo: Reach

Spoiler warning: Unless you've already completed Halo: Reach, there will be spoilers within. I'm going to spend some time wittering on about other stuff first, but there will be spoilers later on. If you're intending on playing it, I'd advise doing so before reading this. I'M NOT KIDDING HERE. I WILL BE SPOILING THE ENTIRE PLOT INCLUDING THE ENDING.

New vocab warning: There will probably be words here you haven't seen before, or at least haven't explored properly. For some of you this won't be true (congratulations, have a gold star), but for the rest of us, don't worry. They're not that scary, and they actually turn out to open whole new areas of really cool conversation (for heavily geeky values of cool), and I'll be linking to Wikipedia as appropriate and/or discussing the terms.

Read on... )
palfrey: (Default)
2010-07-04 04:25 pm

Dealing with excess stuff (or would you like my things?)

Currently I'm in possession of a number of excess items. Excess, in the sense of "I don't need them any more" and I'd like to remove them from my household in some manner. Now, some of these I could just put on eBay, but some of them I'd have difficulty transporting, or I'm just feeling lazy. Any reasonable offer will be accepted, prices start at 1 "beer" (or equivalent). Note that I may well accept offers well below the actual value of goods, especially if someone's willing to turn up at my place and take the sodding things off my hands...
  • Season 4 of Will and Grace (DVD boxset) - good condition, watched once

  • West Wing DVDs - first 11 episodes of Series 1, good intro to the series

  • Illyama 24" TFT (One of these to be exact) - still in perfectly good condition, it's just a lot smaller than my current model..

  • Acer Aspire One A150 (512mb RAM, 120GB HDD, blue case) - the screen is buggered, as in "massive crack down the diagonal", but the rest of the system is fine. Would make a decent server

  • Bog-standard white telephone. Nothing particularly notable. It makes calls, and we've got a spare one

  • Signed paperback copy of "Little Brother" by Cory Doctorow. As this was accidentally sent to me after joining the Open Rights Group (I already have a hardback copy and I'm pretty sure I ticked the "don't send me one" box), this item is available on payment of a reasonable donation to them

Think that's about it. Let the bidding commence!
palfrey: (Default)
2010-06-16 12:44 pm

Om nom nom: Dumpling pseudo-casserole

(It's a working title, but as good a name as I have for the moment)

My household does a fair amount of cooking. Admittedly most of that tends to be Alan, but that's mostly because he gets enthusiastic about it, and also because he tends to be home first (working 10 minutes up the road will do that). Last night was a bit of an exception, with me at least having the idea for what to cook, but then both of us cooking together.

A while back, Alan made casserole, and there was a whole bunch of it leftover, but mostly juices and less content, so I got some of the pork dumplings from the local chinese supermarket and added them in, and it worked pretty well. We hadn't had them in a while, so last night we made a pseudo-casserole with them in. Aside from the dumplings, everything else was just stuff we already had in, so I'll try and detail the things I think were important in the recipe as opposed to those we added in because we had things or had to replace for stuff we didn't. Quantities will be vague, alter to taste and available ingredients.

Base:
- Half a bag of pork dumplings. Not sure quite how many this was (it fed 3), and these were ones with chives.
- 3 peppers, cut into eighths. Quarter them, then chop the quarters in half.

Sauce:
- 1 carton chopped tomatoes. Tesco is doing these for 59p each and then buy-1-get-2-free, so we've got a lot of these in right now.
- Two stock cubes. We used one beef and one chicken, mainly because we only had one beef left :-(
- ~1.5 pints of boiling water
- Herbs and other flavourings to taste. We added some garlic oil (made couple of days earlier from excess garlic and olive oil), soy sauce, rosemary, and a decent quantity of red wine.

Find an oven-suitable dish, fill with base components. Mix all the sauce components together, cover base components. We made the first pint of sauce, figured it wasn't enough, and made up another 1/2 pint from water, soy sauce and red wine. It should be fairly liquid as quite a bit will boil off. Make sure the dumplings are all covered, as otherwise they'll dry up, but the peppers can stick out. Cook for ~30 mins at about 200 C (this is particularly vague, as our oven is somewhat overspec'ed and tends to cook stuff far more rapidly than expected. Short version: keep an eye on it).

This worked very well, and fed three rather hungry people. Red wine + tomato + stock = tasty. Next time, I'd like to try it either with butternut squash cubes or aubergine cubes instead of peppers.
palfrey: (Default)
2010-05-05 05:41 pm

Elections: voting tactically and finding a place to party

I'm annoyed. After putting my money where my mouth is to some extent, earlier stating that I'd vote for candidates opposing the Digital Economy Bill Act, which due to public statements to that effect easily gets me voting for Jonathan Fryer, I've still been considering voting tactically.

Given the state of play in my local seat, a LibDem vote will almost certainly be wasted. And I'm desperately hoping that against predictions, the Conservatives don't possibly get enough seats such that they can ignore the popular vote once again. Voting tactically would be the right thing to do, because I want First-Past-The-Post to be a distant memory, and this may be the last chance for a long time to get rid of it, and voting tactically for Labour would be the use of my vote most likely to get that.

I even wrote an earlier version of this post saying I was going to vote tactically, arguing for rational choices over my conscience, and I found something useful out of that: I can't stomach it. No matter what the arguments, it would result in something I just can't do. If I vote for the LibDems, and it's wasted, I can live with that, even if the Conservatives get in. Life may be a lot more shit, but I'll have a clean conscience. If I vote for Labour, and they got back in, I don't know. Even if they don't get in, even if things go the way I'd like in part due to my vote, I'd still have issues that I can't resolve.

So, I'll be voting the same way I always have (barring London mayorals, where Ken has my support), and agreeing with Nick (except on Nuclear power).

In related news, what's everyone doing election night? I've got the day off afterwards, and I'd like to stay up and watch the whole silly thing. I'm considering the event at the Bethnal Green Working Men's Club. Anyone else up for that?
palfrey: (Default)
2010-03-30 09:58 pm

Putting my money where my mouth is: Voting on the Digital Economy Bill

So, most of you have probably heard about the Digital Economy Bill, and how it's massively fucked up. Various of you have been campaigning, going to demos, writing to MPs, the whole nine yards. I've decided something I'm going to do about this: I will base my voting for the next election entirely on the Digital Economy bill, and how potential MPs/parties deal with it. So, my voting criteria is 3 categories:
  1. What does the potential MP do? - have they publically opposed the bill? Did they vote against it?

  2. What does the party do? - has their party publically opposed the bill? What was the recommendation of their leadership regarding voting

  3. Existing political preferences - if there's nothing else (unlikely) I'll vote according to other issues

So, I will initially choose my vote only from candidates in category 1, proceed to category 2 if there's nothing obvious, and only then to category 3. This is more of a template for these types of voting decision than something explicit for here, given the major parties all having a position and some having some level of opposition (although I will go with actions, not words, as the words in opposition have been contradictory and rather half-hearted).

This will be my *only* criteria. If the crazy bastard George Galloway (being one of the candidates for the local seat this time around) is the only category 1 MP, then I will bite my tongue and vote for him. Who's with me?
palfrey: (Default)
2010-02-05 12:54 am

FOSDEM

I'm going to FOSDEM, the Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting
Still another day of work between now and then, but I will be there!
palfrey: (Default)
2009-12-27 06:23 pm
Entry tags:

Southeastern, or how to make someone consider walking 216 miles

I'm a "loyal" customer of Southeastern - loyal in the sense that short of learning how to drive (or taking the coach that doesn't go particularly nearby), I need to use them to periodically get to/from my parents. Today however, they've managed to cock up in two particularly bad ways.

Admittedly, the first part isn't today-specific, but I've hit it repeatedly while trying to plan things today. They've recently introduced a thing called the HS1, a high-speed rail link whose primary aim is fast Eurostar travel on the English side, but also provides domestic routes as well. Said domestic routes are more expensive than the conventional trains (which are also running, but with a reduced timetable relative to pre-HS1 times), and you need a special ticket, which I didn't have. So, I want to figure out how to get back from my parents (just north of Canterbury) to London, either via traintimes or the National rail service. Neither have any notation noting which trains are HS1, and only grepping the PDFs on Southeastern tells you which are them. If I screwed up, I'd get fined for being on the wrong train... As the HS1's go to Stratford International which is nearer home than the other London termini, I would have actually quite like to have taken one. So, that's fail number one.

Fail number two involved my managing to locate one of the remaining non-HS1 services, specifically the 15:05 from Chestfield and Swalecliffe towards Victoria. Firstly, the station announcements claimed it was only going to Whitstable (next station along). Not wanting to wait for another hour, I figured I'd get on it anyway and hope that Whistable (as a slightly larger station) would give me more options. Had a quick gander at the National Rail site on my phone, and we've got new data. Now, it's going to Faversham (an even bigger interchange station one more along), but cancelled from there on in. It dutifully turns up, and I get on. The train itself claims it's a normal Victoria service, and I'm feeling moderately optimistic. It promptly goes past Whistable, past Faversham, and proceeds to do what it was meant to do originally and go to Victoria. A nice turn of events in the end, but the level of disinformation is rather disquieting, and indicative of larger issues.

All in all, a bit of a fail day for Southeastern, but at leas I'm home now (well, until I head out again shortly!)

Update: Forgot also to mention the fail heading up on the 23rd, when they kept cancelling stations my train was going to, while we were on it. This was ok up until they cancelled the one we were heading for...
palfrey: (Default)
2009-11-04 04:21 pm

μ-Update

(The title is partially a wish to test Facebook's importing capabilities, as all my public entries here get automagically dragged in)

I started reading "The Eyre Affair" by Jasper Fforde this morning, which so far is a damn good book. Major reason for this post would be a space larger than Twitter for this quote from it:
"They sequenced a Stella's Seacow last week. How do I even get one of those through the door?"
"Grease its sides", I suggested, "And show it a plate of kelp?"

That sums up the book a bit - little bit surreal, but considering consequences of odd actions. I'm currently being very amused.

Also, I appear to have agreed into heading along to a Maelfroth event (LARP-related pub meet) this evening, which sounds like a fun idea right now, but over the longer term may be a really bad idea. Yes, I do want to LARP at some point, but timesinks I already have in abundance.

Additionally, I've just borrowed Maus from ICSF, which looks good, and something I've wanted to read for a bit.
palfrey: (Default)
2009-10-29 03:49 pm

John Ringo: Right-Wing Nutjob

I've just finished today reading "Yellow Eyes", one of the "Legacy of the Aldenata" books by John Ringo. I've been a fan of these for a while, but I will now not be reading any more of his work, partially due to some of the main content of this book, but especially the "authorial afterword" which was several steps too far in my opinion.

In all fairness, I knew what I was getting into. The books are basically about humanity with the aid of some pacifist aliens trying to defeat another alien species (Posleen) that's invading enmass (and I mean *millions*). That a series of books written about and glorifying near-future war is written by a right-wing gun nut is practically a given. I didn't mind this, because they were *fun*, and provided they stuck to new and novel ways to kill the Posleen, I was happy to keep borrowing them from ICSF's library. Boys with toys, etc.

Yellow Eyes stepped over a line and started espousing what I would regard as bonkers opinions on certain current-day political issues. Well, I say issues, they're kinda AFAIK non-issues outside of the US, but they're still bitching. Cut for book spoilers )

However, the message of various bits of the book is that "rules of war" (especially the Fourth Geneva Convention), the International Criminal Court and things like various countries not needing an army any more will result in the death of humanity as a whole. I was able to skip over a lot of this until near the end, when it became much more storyline-critical.

The authorial afterword gets even more nuts, claiming that the ICC, the EU and various other things are the direct descendants of Marxism-Leninism, and has a bunch of massively flawed bits wittering on about "American national sovereignity" and so on. It's pretty much a variant of "you'll have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hands", but with fractionally better use of language.

So, yeah. Nutjobs. Having looked up the co-author on this one (Tom Kratman) it looks like he may well be substantially responsible for the new slant here, but it's enough to put me off reading any more of it ever again...